1970 Audi Super 90 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Audi Super 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Audi Super 90 would be higher. At 1,759 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Audi Super 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1970 Audi Super 90. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Because 1970 Audi Super 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Audi Super 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (231 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Audi Super 90. (149 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Audi Super 90 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | Super 90 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1759 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 231 Nm |
| Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |
