1970 Audi Super 90 vs. 2007 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Audi Super 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Audi Super 90 would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1970 Audi Super 90. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Audi Super 90. (149 Nm). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Audi Super 90 | 2007 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | Super 90 | CTS |
Year Released | 1970 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1759 cc | 2801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 263 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2890 mm |