1970 Audi Super 90 vs. 2012 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Audi Super 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Audi Super 90 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1970 Audi Super 90. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Because 1970 Audi Super 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Audi Super 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi (230 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Audi Super 90. (149 Nm). This means 2012 Suzuki Kizashi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Audi Super 90.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Audi Super 90 | 2012 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | Super 90 | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1970 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1759 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 230 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |