1970 Audi Variant vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,696 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Audi Variant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1970 Audi Variant. (53 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Audi Variant weights approximately 626 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Audi Variant | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Audi | Westfield |
Model | Variant | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 444 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2320 mm |