1970 Audi Variant vs. 2009 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Audi Variant would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1970 Audi Variant. (53 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1970 Audi Variant.
Because 2009 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Audi Variant. (113 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Audi Variant | 2009 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | Variant | XJ |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 297 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3040 mm |
