1970 Austin 1800 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Austin 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Austin 1800 (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Austin 1800 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Austin 1800 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Austin 1800 (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1970 Austin 1800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Austin 1800 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | 1800 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2160 mm |
