1970 Austin 1800 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1970 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1970 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1970 Austin 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Austin 1800 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 1800 | 3 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 55 L |