1970 Austin 1800 vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Austin 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 2 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1970 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1970 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Austin 1800 weights approximately 144 kg more than 2012 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Austin 1800 (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1970 Austin 1800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Austin 1800 | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 1800 | 2 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 43 L |