1970 Austin 3 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1970 Austin 3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1970 Austin 3. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1970 Austin 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 635 kg more than 1970 Austin 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Austin 3 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | 3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2910 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 79 L |
