1970 Austin 3 vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Austin 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Austin 3 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1970 Austin 3. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1970 Austin 3.
Because 1970 Austin 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Austin 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Austin 3. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Austin 3.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Austin 3 | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Austin | Oldsmobile |
Model | 3 | SS |
Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1900 mm |