1970 Austin 3 vs. 2002 Ford Tonka
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Austin 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Austin 3 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Tonka (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1970 Austin 3. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka should accelerate faster than 1970 Austin 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Austin 3 weights approximately 188 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Austin 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 596 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Austin 3. (218 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Austin 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Austin 3 | 2002 Ford Tonka | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | 3 | Tonka |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2910 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 814 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1302 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 6150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2370 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 4200 mm |
