1970 Austin 3 vs. 2002 Toyota Pod
To start off, 2002 Toyota Pod is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Austin 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Austin 3 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Austin 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Pod (194 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1970 Austin 3. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Pod should accelerate faster than 1970 Austin 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Austin 3 weights approximately 550 kg more than 2002 Toyota Pod.
Because 1970 Austin 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Austin 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Pod, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Pod (430 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Austin 3. (218 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Pod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Austin 3.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Austin 3 | 2002 Toyota Pod | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 3 | Pod |
Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 430 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 48 L |