1970 Austin 3 vs. 2002 Volkswagen W12
To start off, 2002 Volkswagen W12 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Austin 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Austin 3 would be higher. At 5,982 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen W12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen W12 (600 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 477 more horse power than 1970 Austin 3. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen W12 should accelerate faster than 1970 Austin 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Austin 3 weights approximately 239 kg more than 2002 Volkswagen W12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volkswagen W12 (335 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Austin 3. (218 Nm). This means 2002 Volkswagen W12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Austin 3.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Austin 3 | 2002 Volkswagen W12 | |
Make | Austin | Volkswagen |
Model | 3 | W12 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 5982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 600 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 335 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1251 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |