1970 Austin 3 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Austin 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Austin 3 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Austin 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1970 Austin 3. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1970 Austin 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Austin 3 weights approximately 190 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Austin 3. (218 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Austin 3.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Austin 3 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | 3 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1970 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 61 L |