1970 Austin 3 vs. 2005 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Austin 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Austin 3 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Austin 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1970 Austin 3. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1970 Austin 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Austin 3 weights approximately 1050 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Austin 3 | 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Austin | Westfield |
Model | 3 | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2320 mm |