1970 Austin 3 vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Austin 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Austin 3 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Austin 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Austin 3 weights approximately 540 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1970 Austin 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Austin 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Austin 3 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1970 Austin 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Austin 3 | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | 3 | Rustler |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 2910 cc | 1323 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 71 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 950 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 54 L |
