1970 Austin Maxi vs. 1981 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1981 Toyota Cressida is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 180 kg more than 1970 Austin Maxi.
Because 1981 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Austin Maxi | 1981 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Maxi | Cressida |
Year Released | 1970 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1483 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 142 km/hour | 171 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |