1970 Autobianchi Primula vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1970 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1970 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 445 kg more than 1970 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Autobianchi Primula | 2000 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
| Model | Primula | Puma |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 1679 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 42 L |
