1970 Bizzarrini Manta vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Bizzarrini Manta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Bizzarrini Manta would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Bizzarrini Manta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Bizzarrini Manta (350 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2006 Acura CSX. (155 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Bizzarrini Manta should accelerate faster than 2006 Acura CSX.
Because 1970 Bizzarrini Manta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Bizzarrini Manta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Acura CSX has automatic transmission and 1970 Bizzarrini Manta has manual transmission. 1970 Bizzarrini Manta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Acura CSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Bizzarrini Manta | 2006 Acura CSX | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Acura |
Model | Manta | CSX |
Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |