1970 BMW 2000 vs. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1970 BMW 2000 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 346 kg more than 1970 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 BMW 2000 | 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | BMW | Studebaker |
Model | 2000 | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1970 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 209 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2980 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |