1970 BMW 2000 vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1970 BMW 2000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 996 kg more than 1970 BMW 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 BMW 2000 | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 2000 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3300 mm |
