1970 BMW 2000 vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1970 BMW 2000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 BMW 2000 weights approximately 249 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 BMW 2000 | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | BMW | Zastava |
| Model | 2000 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2010 mm |
