1970 BMW 2000 vs. 1979 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1979 Zastava 1500 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 BMW 2000 weights approximately 64 kg more than 1979 Zastava 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 BMW 2000 | 1979 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 2000 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1479 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2430 mm |