1970 BMW 2000 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 BMW 2000 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 59 L |