1970 BMW 2002 vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1970 BMW 2002. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1970 BMW 2002. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 660 kg more than 1970 BMW 2002. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 BMW 2002. (157 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1970 BMW 2002 | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 2002 | Clio |
Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |