1970 Bristol 411 vs. 1980 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1980 Mercury Cougar is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Bristol 411. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Bristol 411 would be higher. At 6,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Bristol 411 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Bristol 411 (288 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1980 Mercury Cougar. (90 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Bristol 411 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Bristol 411 weights approximately 395 kg more than 1980 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Bristol 411 (588 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 424 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mercury Cougar. (164 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1970 Bristol 411 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mercury Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Bristol 411 | 1980 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Bristol | Mercury |
Model | 411 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1970 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6277 cc | 2301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 588 Nm | 164 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2690 mm |