1970 Buick Riviera vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Buick Riviera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Buick Riviera would be higher. At 7,468 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Buick Riviera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Buick Riviera (265 HP) has 195 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Buick Riviera should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Buick Riviera weights approximately 1246 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Buick Riviera (522 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1970 Buick Riviera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade. 1970 Buick Riviera has automatic transmission and 2003 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2003 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1970 Buick Riviera will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: