1970 Buick Skylark vs. 2003 Citroen C3
To start off, 2003 Citroen C3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 5,724 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Buick Skylark (195 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C3. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Buick Skylark weights approximately 454 kg more than 2003 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Buick Skylark is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Buick Skylark. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Buick Skylark (393 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C3. (143 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1970 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Buick Skylark | 2003 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Buick | Citroen |
Model | Skylark | C3 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5724 cc | 1628 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2610 mm |