1970 Buick Skylark vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 5,724 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1970 Buick Skylark. (195 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1970 Buick Skylark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 215 kg more than 1970 Buick Skylark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Buick Skylark. (393 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Buick Skylark.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Buick Skylark | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | Skylark | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1970 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5724 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1844 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2730 mm |