1970 Buick Skylark vs. 2009 Nissan Qashqai

To start off, 2009 Nissan Qashqai is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 5,723 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Buick Skylark (155 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Qashqai. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Buick Skylark should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Qashqai. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Buick Skylark weights approximately 350 kg more than 2009 Nissan Qashqai. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Buick Skylark is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Buick Skylark. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Qashqai, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Buick Skylark (366 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Qashqai. (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1970 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Qashqai.

Compare all specifications:

1970 Buick Skylark 2009 Nissan Qashqai
Make Buick Nissan
Model Skylark Qashqai
Year Released 1970 2009
Body Type Station Wagon Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5723 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 155 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 366 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96.5 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 97.8 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 15.6:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1870 kg 1520 kg
Vehicle Length 5430 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1960 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2640 mm