1970 Buick Skylark vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 5,724 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1970 Buick Skylark. (195 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1970 Buick Skylark.
Because 1970 Buick Skylark is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Buick Skylark. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Buick Skylark (393 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C70. (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1970 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Buick Skylark | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | Skylark | C70 |
Year Released | 1970 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5724 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 239 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1840 mm |