1970 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1963 DKW Junior
To start off, 1970 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Junior would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1963 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Junior. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1486 kg more than 1963 DKW Junior. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac Brougham | 1963 DKW Junior | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | Brougham | Junior |
Year Released | 1970 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2180 mm |