1970 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1963 Triumph TR4
To start off, 1970 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph TR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph TR4 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1963 Triumph TR4. (104 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph TR4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1231 kg more than 1963 Triumph TR4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Cadillac Brougham | 1963 Triumph TR4 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | Brougham | TR4 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2240 mm |
