1970 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1386 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1970 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Cadillac Brougham | 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Brougham | Colt |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2310 mm |
