1970 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 1996 Proton 300 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1996 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1161 kg more than 1996 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Cadillac Brougham | 1996 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Proton |
| Model | Brougham | 300 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2450 mm |
