1970 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2002 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 718 kg more than 2002 Honda CR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | Brougham | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2630 mm |
