1970 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP) has 158 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1456 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Cadillac Brougham | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Cadillac | MCC |
| Model | Brougham | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 1810 mm |
