1970 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2006 Mercedes-Benz R. (221 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercedes-Benz R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz R weights approximately 74 kg more than 1970 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac Brougham | 2006 Mercedes-Benz R | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Brougham | R |
Year Released | 1970 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 2270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3220 mm |