1970 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1970 Cadillac Brougham. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1970 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 428 kg more than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac Brougham | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | Brougham | CTS |
Year Released | 1970 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 1768 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1882 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2880 mm |