1970 Cadillac Calais vs. 1996 Citroen XM
To start off, 1996 Citroen XM is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1996 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 820 kg more than 1996 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac Calais | 1996 Citroen XM | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | Calais | XM |
Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |