1970 Cadillac Calais vs. 1996 Mitsubishi L 200
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi L 200. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi L 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 395 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi L 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac Calais | 1996 Mitsubishi L 200 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Calais | L 200 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2477 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2970 mm |