1970 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1970 Cadillac Calais. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1970 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 461 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | Calais | XJ |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 294 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2076 kg | 1615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3040 mm |
