1970 Cadillac Calais vs. 2004 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Malibu. (200 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Malibu. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 605 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Malibu. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Cadillac Calais | 2004 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Calais | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1970 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1495 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2650 mm |
