1970 Cadillac Calais vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1970 Cadillac Calais. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1970 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 108 kg more than 1970 Cadillac Calais. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac Calais | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Calais | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1970 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2076 kg | 2184 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2790 mm |