1970 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1975 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1975 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1208 kg more than 1975 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac DeVille | 1975 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1975 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2058 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2320 mm |