1970 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 1983 Volvo 240 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4650 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 630 kg more than 1983 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac DeVille | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | DeVille | 240 |
Year Released | 1970 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7735 cc | 2315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |