1970 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 Maserati Shamal
To start off, 1996 Maserati Shamal is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Maserati Shamal (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1970 Cadillac DeVille. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Maserati Shamal should accelerate faster than 1970 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 785 kg more than 1996 Maserati Shamal.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 Maserati Shamal | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | DeVille | Shamal |
Year Released | 1970 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 3217 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2520 mm |