1970 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 1970 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Sixty (228 HP) has 177 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1226 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac Sixty | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Sixty | FX |
Year Released | 1970 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 4380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2620 mm |