1970 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1982 Kia Brisa
To start off, 1982 Kia Brisa is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Sixty (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1982 Kia Brisa. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1982 Kia Brisa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1406 kg more than 1982 Kia Brisa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1970 Cadillac Sixty | 1982 Kia Brisa | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | Sixty | Brisa |
Year Released | 1970 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 3860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2270 mm |