1970 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1985 Volvo 780
To start off, 1985 Volvo 780 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Sixty (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1985 Volvo 780. (145 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1985 Volvo 780. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 776 kg more than 1985 Volvo 780. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1970 Cadillac Sixty | 1985 Volvo 780 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Sixty | 780 |
| Year Released | 1970 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2849 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2196 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5810 mm | 4800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2780 mm |
